Diversity Rocks

Sarah Gavron and Theresa Ikoko on capturing the teenage spirit and pushing the industry forward

by Amber Wilkinson

Bukky Bakray as Rocks (blue denim) with her crew in the film. Sarah Gavron: 'I had a whole support structure in terms of harnessing that energy but I definitely lost my voice more than I've ever lost my voice on a shoot before'
Bukky Bakray as Rocks (blue denim) with her crew in the film. Sarah Gavron: 'I had a whole support structure in terms of harnessing that energy but I definitely lost my voice more than I've ever lost my voice on a shoot before' Photo: Courtesy of London Film Festival
In the second part of our chat with director Sarah Gavron and writer Theresa Ikoko in San Sebastian about Rocks - which charts a teenage girl's attempts to hide the fact her mum has left her and her brother home alone and had its domestic premiere at London Film Festival. They talk about capturing the energy of their young cast on camera, which happened after a long-term series of workshops that saw them collaborate with their young cast, including stars Bukky Bakray, who plays Rocks, and D'angelou Osei Kissiedu, who stars as her younger brother Emmanuel. They also discuss how they worked with cinematographer Hélène Louvart to capture it all on camera and the continued push for more diversity in the industry.

You capture the high energy and noise of youngsters - but that must have been quite hard to capture on camera.

Sarah Gavron: Theresa was on set so much of the time, so we kind of collaborated and it was very helpful to me to have other people sharing that role with me. We had to harness that energy. They were bringing huge amounts but their would be moments where, for example, where the social workers came and Bukky was trying to find how she could respond emotionally and it was a moment where I felt like Theresa should come into that situation and talk as the writer and as someone who understood that world so well directly to the cast and Bukky. So, what I'd say is that I had a whole support structure in terms of harnessing that energy but I definitely lost my voice more than I've ever lost my voice on a shoot before.

In terms of the diversity of the cast, did you blind cast it?

TI: It was just any girl and we had loads of girls and a diverse group all the way through. These happened to be the girls who gravitated towards each other. We pretty much say they cast themselves because you couldn't take one girl out of the other six really. That's how they rolled and it would have been devastating and very immoral to separate them and the gift that they brought was their friendship. Not to celebrate that on screen would have been a huge mistake. It was during the workshop process that they became friends and it became about nurturing that friendship and getting to witness it. It was such a joy to watch this thing that's so defining in a woman's life - to find your best friends. To get to see that over the space of a year was such a joy and that's what we wanted to highlight and celebrate.

You have a great director of photography in Hélène Louvart. Can you talk about choosing her.

Theresa Ikoko and Sarah Gavron in San Sebastian. Ikoko: Because Sara decided to use her platform and hold the door open for an army of women of colour to come through, it means that now, hopefully, I can one day say, 'I'm going to make a film, I don't know what it's about but just trust me'.
Theresa Ikoko and Sarah Gavron in San Sebastian. Ikoko: Because Sara decided to use her platform and hold the door open for an army of women of colour to come through, it means that now, hopefully, I can one day say, 'I'm going to make a film, I don't know what it's about but just trust me'. Photo: Courtesy of San Sebastian Film Festival/Pablo Gomez
SG: It was almost about casting our crew - that became really important. We wanted the young people to feel comfortable and we wanted the crew to be connected to the world of the film. I'd worked with a lot of really fantastic male DPs but it felt appropriate on this film to go out and says, "Let's find a woman who connects with this story". I met a few really great women and Hélène responded immediately to the emotion of the story. She was so moved by Theresa and Claire's script in our very first meeting and had so much to say about each emotional beat - and that felt like the right sensibility. Apart from the fact that I was a huge admirer of her work - she'd worked with Eliza Hitman (Beach Rats),  Alice Rohrwacher (Happy As Lazzaro), all these heroes of cinema for me, so that was hugely exciting to have her on the team. Then she worked closely with another DP as a second camera operator, called Rachel Clark, and they were almost dancing around the girls and they both formed really sweet, close bonds with the girls, as did all the other crew.

How did you manage to build a safe space on location and get these emotions from the young women and from the boy who plays Emmanuel.

Theresa Ikoko: This really was a film made from love so, in that, there was so much safety and there was so much trust. I hope that nobody ever felt uncomfortable. The girls would even say, 'Cut' themselves, if they wanted to have a conversation. So it really was a safe space. In the case of D'angelou Osei Kissiedu, who plays Emmanuel, his closeness with Bukky was what kept him safe. Whenever he couldn't see his mum, he looked to her. They became a real brother and sister off and on camera - loved an hated each other the way siblings do. Bukky did amazingly with him and worked really hard to be his rock on set and they're still very close today.

Can you elaborate more on the use of two cameras?

SG:The idea was that the emphasis on this film would be all about capturing the girls from the inside, so we didn't feel that we were standing back and watching them as removed adults. We just wanted it to feel that we were in their world, we were with them and we were at their level, in terms of the height of the camera and that we were following them, where appropriate. Occasionally we drew attention to what they were looking at, so it was the teenage gaze was what we all called it, the teenage girl gaze rather than anybody else's point of view. The two cameras enabled us that if they did something spontaneous in a take in the way they moved or how they expressed themselves physically, because we had two cameras we didn't have to get the usual coverage and go back and repeat it, we had options in the cutting room and could use that moment of the performance. Helene was really on board - often DPs resist the idea of two cameras. I said right in the first interview that this was the only way we could do it and I'd do it on a couple of things - I did it on Transparent in America and really found it useful because there was a lot of that kind of spontaneity and I had done it on Suffragette. And she didn't resist it at all. She said: 'It's right for this project, let's do it.'

How important was the fact that the technical team was mostly women as well?

SG: You didn't know that was unusual.

Theresa Ikoko on making Rocks: 'I think what really happened in this film was that seeing loads of women behind the camera showing what they could become, not only helped the girls but for me, as my first film, it was super-inspiring'
Theresa Ikoko on making Rocks: 'I think what really happened in this film was that seeing loads of women behind the camera showing what they could become, not only helped the girls but for me, as my first film, it was super-inspiring' Photo: Courtesy of London Film Festival
TI: No, I thought, why does everybody moan about films, this is the best, most nurturing experience ever. And everyone was, like, "No. This is unusual". I think what was important, and I think Sara and the producer's intention was really to try to create a safe space and an aspirational space for the young women. I think what really happened in this film was that seeing loads of women behind the camera showing what they could become, not only helped the girls but for me, as my first film, it was super-inspiring. There was so much mentoring happening on set. Sarah allowed me to come in, which again I didn't think was unusual. Then I went home and told friends of mine and they said, "Firstly, you were allowed on set?" But she let me in the scene. The first assistant director gave me her headset at one poitn because I had notes, she said: "Just speak into the mic, they'll here you." I've spoken to other people who have been on set and they are barely allowed to sneeze, let alone give notes. For me, I had a moment on set where I thought: "This is what I want to do." Had I not seen women who were doing that and who were nurturing and mentoring, I don't know if I would have had that. It was a training ground for myself and the girls and they probably taught Sara a thing or two as well. It was such a mutual exchange of resources, of aspiration and ambition.

Do you have the feeling that things are changing in terms of diversity in film production?

SG: It's interesting because we talked in previous chats about whether we're making strides in the film industry, to incorporate more people from BAME (black and Asian minority ethnic groups) backgrounds - and I think it's very slow and that, particularly, there aren't many women of colour in the film industry, there just aren't. There are five per cent of producers in Britain who are from a BAME background and our producer Ameena Ayub Allen is that five per cent. So I'd say there's a big issue around that and we can't be complacent about it because while on this production we made strides, strides still need to be taken. In terms of women, when I came out of film school 20 years ago, I remember that year, four per cent of films were directed by women and then the next year it was seven per cent and and everyone went, "Whoo!" and the next year it was three per cent and it just sort of teetered for literally 15 years, never rising. So the question of why are there so few women just came up and came up. I would say, and it's just from a personal point of view, that the Me Too movement, in terms of women in the film industry, has really shifted something and Tarana Burke speaking out and everyone jumping on it and Time's Up coming out of that, suddenly there's been a kind of wake-up moment that I feel very grateful for and I hope more projects happen like this and are supported.

TI: People talk about diversity and why there aren't more women of colour in film. We have a lot of institutions that go on about their strategies to diversify and we know really that they consider new talent of colour a risk. A lot of the wording around it is "taking a risk" on this director or "taking a risk" on this writer and we aren't risks, we are great investments that give great returns. It takes women like Sara who will use their platform and men who will use their platform and open doors and then hold the doors open. This was a very different way of making a film and, if we're honest, a black female director would never have got the backing to make a film in this way. We said: 'We don't know what the film's about yet but just trust us.' Because Sara decided to use her platform and hold the door open for an army of women of colour to come through, it means that now, hopefully, I can one day say, 'I'm going to make a film, I don't know what it's about but just trust me'. I think it really does take people to acknowledge their privilege and power an be responsible and generous with that.

SG: I'm grateful to them for what they brought, so it was mutually beneficial.

Do you find your facing obstacles around casting in terms of taking on "box office" names?

SG: I've definitely encountered that and learnt a lot in the process of making Suffragette. It was partly because it was a bigger budget film and it was like, "No, you have to cast in a particular way." With this project, we always knew that we wanted to work with these young people, so that brought with it a certain level of budget but that suited the territory of the film. From the beginning, it was on the table that we weren't going to get known actors, so it was never an issue but it did mean that we had to do a lot of telling the financiers about why this film could work and reassuring them. The producers had this idea - which was very effective - because we were filming in our workshops all the time using our iPhones, of putting together tapes of the workshops that we could share with them. So it was almost like they were feeling invested as we went through.

So, what are your plans for the future?

TI: To keep making films exactly like this in the exact same way because I don't see why you should have to do it any other way apart from doing it surrounded by people who you love, who love the world you are creating and would give absolutely anything for it. And we're going to keep at it.

The film will be released in UK cinemas on April 10, 2020.

News

Man about town Gay Talese on Watching Frank, Frank Sinatra, and his latest book, A Town Without Time

Magnificent creatures Jayro Bustamante on giving the girls of Hogar Seguro a voice in Rita

A unified vision DOC NYC highlights and cinematographer Michael Crommett on Dan Winters: Life Is Once. Forever.

Poetry and loss Géza Röhrig on Terrence Malick, Josh Safdie, and Richard Kroehling’s After: Poetry Destroys Silence

'I’m still enjoying the process of talking about Julie and advocating for her silence' Leonardo van Dijl on Belgian Oscar nominee Julie Keeps Quiet

More news and features

Interact

More competitions coming soon.